I’ll post in more detail on this general topic shortly, but a particularly and entertainingly muddle-headed piece of journalism in the Russian magazine Versiya did oblige me to comment. It paints the usual blood-curdling picture of Russian organised crime’s global activities. It’s “300,000” members outside Russia reportedly control 90% of the drug trafficking into Spain, dominate the European underworlds, intimidate even Al Qaeda, and so it goes. Professionally, of course, it is always in my interests for there to be a good measure of hysteria about Russian OC: the more of a threat it seems, the more interest there is in my work. But more objectively, let’s just step back from this. The 300,000 figure, for a start, runs the risk of becoming one of those apocryphal figures everyone re-uses because they don’t have any viable alternatives (like the still-recurring “40%” of the Russian economy reportedly controlled by OC). How do we really know? More to the point, the original data on which it is based (from Italian prosecutors who, to be sure, know their stuff) refers to ethnic Russian criminals, not necessarily members of organised crime groupings, and there is a big difference. More to the point, given the especially flexible, networked nature of most Russian OC, and especially that operating outside the Motherland, there is an open question as to how far we can describe what are often multi-ethnic associations as ‘Russian OC’. Definitely something to return to later, but for the moment I can simply be gratified and exasperated in equal measure as to the superficial reporting which still dominates so much coverage of Russian OC, wherever it may be published.
The Russian mafiya’s mythical international army
Posted by Mark Galeotti on March 2, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/the-russian-mafiyas-mythical-international-army/
Russia’s new military doctrine: not so much revised as concentrated
On 5 February, President Medvedev signed into law the long-awaited (in other words, overdue) new military doctrine document. I don’t propose at this point to post much about it, not least as there have already been excellent immediate-response analyses from Dmitry Gorenburg and the anonymous author of the Russian Defense Policy blog. My overwhelming sense is that the 2010 document is fundamentally very close to its 2000 predecessor, albeit a lot more tightly written. Much the same can be said about the doctrine itself. It does not so much change the fundamentals of the previous doctrine as distill them. More to the point, it seems to represent on the one hand a grudging retreat from claims to a truly global status (long overdue) but on the other a much sharper and arguably more aggressive assertion of its regional power status and, indeed, its claims to hegemony in post-Soviet Eurasia. So, NATO is no longer the enemy — but NATO expansion into the ‘Near Abroad’ and even the penetration of its influence there is listed as the greatest military danger (which is different from a threat) to Russia. Likewise, attempts to ‘destabilise states and regions’ near Russia — presumably we’re back to the bugbear of nefarious Westerners engineering pro-democracy movements in Eurasia — are explicitly listed as a danger. Maybe Moscow has come to realise the wisdom of Frederick the Great’s dictum, that if you try to hold everything, you hold nothing. In the future, me may see less global grandstanding (Moscow’s tougher line on Iran’s nuclear policy could prove encouraging) but this is not going to reflect any more conciliatory line so much as a greater concentration of effort on both securing Eurasian hegemony and ejecting foreign influence from the region, something unlikely to be a great comfort to its neighbours.
Posted by Mark Galeotti on February 11, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/russias-new-military-doctrine-not-so-much-revised-as-concentrated/
New series at the NYU Center for Global Affairs: ‘Bad Company: conversations about the new global underworld’
Not related to Russia – at least not in this first batch of speakers – but I just wanted to mention a new series I’ll be hosting at the Center for Global Affairs at New York University, in which I’l be engaging academic experts in some aspect of modern organised crime in a discussion about their work. This semester, we’ll be looking at Burma’s Wa region drug warlords with Ko-lin Chin (Rutgers-Newark) on March 1, Eastern Europe with Kelly Hignett (Hull, UK) on March 22 and Mexico with Pablo Piccato (Columbia) on April 12. These are free public events, but you do need to register in advance – details are here.
Posted by Mark Galeotti on February 10, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/new-series-at-the-nyu-center-for-global-affairs-bad-company-conversations-about-the-new-global-underworld/
New book: ‘The Politics of Security in Modern Russia’
Time for a necessary self-indulgent notice: my latest edited book, The Politics of Security in Modern Russia, has just been released by Ashgate. Ed Lucas of the Economist calls it “Incisive, well-informed and disturbing” and — having had to harry hard-working and long-suffering contributors for re-writes when the original manuscript was all but done because of the Georgian war and the economic crisis — I call it a blessed relief to see it out!
You can find the full details and extracts on the publisher’s website Read the full post »
Posted by Mark Galeotti on February 2, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/new-book-the-politics-of-security-in-modern-russia/
Mixed messages from Moscow’s 2009 crime figures
Moscow police chief Major General Vladimir Kolokoltsev managed a populist one-two punch on 20 January. While congratulating himself on a decline in overall crime rates in the city in a press conference, he also got to single out the city’s migrant population as especially criminal. Yet the hidden subtext is also the continuing problem with police corruption and criminality.
Posted by Mark Galeotti on January 21, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/01/21/mixed-messages-from-moscow%e2%80%99s-2009-crime-figures/
Senior military dismissals strengthen CoGS Makarov’s hand and may mean decline of Main Operations Directorate
Substantive reshuffles of the Russian military high command tend to mean something. In the present climate, they tend to mean a purge of opponents to military reform as the unexpectedly effective (and necessarily ruthless) team of Defence Minister Anatoly Serdyukov and Chief of the General Staff Nikolai Makarov push forward the next stage of their long-overdue modernisation programme. On 13 January 2010, they claimed two more exalted scalps: Colonel General Vladimir Boldyrev, commander-in-chief of the Ground Forces, and Major General Sergei Surovikin, head of the General Staff’s Main Operations Directorate (GUO).
Posted by Mark Galeotti on January 16, 2010
https://inmoscowsshadows.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/senior-military-dismissals-strengthen-cogs-makarov%e2%80%99s-hand-and-may-mean-decline-of-main-operations-directorate/
