Purging Purgin, Pushing Pushilin (full version)

Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving?

Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving?

News just in that Denis Pushilin has just been elected interim speaker of the parliament (People’s Council) of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), replacing Andrei Purgin. Pushilin, who had held that role May-July 2014, used language fit for the 1930s, when he explained Purgin’s ouster as following an attempt by him

“to disrupt the meeting of the People’s Council, when the deputies had to listen to false declarations made with the aim of increasing tensions and destabilizing the situation.”

Maybe. Meanwhile there is all kinds of excitement in the area. There were suggestions that Russian paratroopers were seizing key locations in Donetsk (which is possible, but given the interpenetration these days of Russian and militia units, as well as the use of Russian kit by the latter, hard to confirm). Indeed, according to some reports, Purgin and his wife are under arrest. Alexei Alexandrov, the People’s Council’s chief of staff, has also been sacked (Pushilin presented him as some kind of Rasputin figure leading Purgin astray, so there may be a scapegoat in the making, if politics requires an eventual kiss and make up moment). Zakharchenko, the overall DNR supremo, was apparently not present, so a key question will be his fate and how he responds.

The anti-Purgin vote was a pretty definitive 70 votes out of a possible 73 according to TASS, “almost unanimous” in RIA’s words. However, this is unlikely to have been either a purely local initiative — in other words, without Moscow’s OK or initiation — or something determined by anything as bourgeois as votes in an anyway-illegitimate parliament.

So what might this mean? The politics of the DNR (and LNR, for that matter) have all the well-mannered and collegial constitutionality of a Brazilian prison riot), but the core leitmotif is the tension between local relationships and the local/Moscow relations. We should not assume that Moscow calls all the shots all the time. Indeed, often the very issue is that it finds itself manipulated, exploited, misled or ignored by its notional agents (as is always the way with empires). The knack, after all, is to get Moscow’s backing, but also be sufficiently autonomous to accrue power and money from the position. Pushilin’s track record is, if anything, more avaricious than Purgin’s, so this was as much a struggle over economic as political assets (though the point is, of course, that ultimately they really are one and the same).

The Purgin-Pushilin tensions and personal ambitions aside, though, there is an inevitable Kremlin dimension. There have been on-and-off indications that Moscow is concerned about tightening its grip on the region (witness the greater integration of military units, under regular Russian officers), and if what Brian Whitmore calls a “soft annexation” is increasingly the least-worst option the Kremlin is having to adopt, maybe it is time to ensure a compliant man at the top. Persistent rumours have linked Pushilin to once-and-future dramaturge-in-chief Vladislav Surkov, while Purgin is presumably more of a Vyacheslav Volodin man. This may also thus signal not just a change in policy but also another swing of the pendulum as authority for the “Donbas adventure” is exchanged between the more straightforward and bullish Volodin and the more subtle, if sometimes too smart for his own good Surkov.

Alternatively, Purgin was just returning to Donetsk after meetings with Volodin, so it could be that this was a local elite and their metropolitan allies seeking to resist such a move. If so, I wonder how well those local legislators will fare, as Moscow — even if forced for the moment to accept the facts on the ground — will not forget this.

Overall, though, I suspect we are seeing another step towards the “Transniestrianisation” of the Donbas, something that conforms with the underlying mood I felt in Moscow this summer, a sense of resignation, that there were no magical solutions to the various problems now challenging Russia — economic, political, geopolitical — and they just had to be weathered.

[apologies, incidentally, for the premature publication of just half this post, and also for the undue number of typos in the first drafts]

Leave a comment

5 Comments

  1. What is rather strange is that Putin and his minions now do not seem to have any other model than the Cold War for foreign relations, at least WRT the ‘Near Abroad’. The ‘Frozen Conflicts’ appear to be just miniaturized variants of occupied Eastern European 1945-91. The only difference is that now Moscow dare not move openly, as it did during Soviet times. This is a real headache for Europe, but also a signal that we are entering another era of stagnation for Russia.

    Reply
  2. What a lot progandized diatribe this article is!
    If Neocons had any evidence of involvement by Russia regular Army in Novorossiya, MSM would go on a 24/7 saturation news bombing.

    All the U.S. has to do is to practice the virtue of humility, on a small scale, and stop wasting money, capital, and more importantly refrain from provoking other countries, long-established countries, with old cultures, languages, customs, which existed well before the U.S. was born.

    There is a Natural Justice and soon, the same old U.S.(which used to be good) wIll have to learn, but the hard way. They must now realize that the USSR is gone, now there is a a proud country, Russian Nation, united with their President, and they have proposed that the world is now MULTI-POLAR :
    Once the Nato/US/ accept that truth, the world will be safer.

    Reply
    • Mark Galeotti

       /  September 5, 2015

      How extraordinary.
      (a) Seriously, you think only “neocons” think Russia has troops in Ukraine?
      (b) Seriously, you think this all because of the USA? You really think Washington decides policy and attitudes across the whole West and beyond? I’d sure that would be a delightful discovery in DC.
      (c) Seriously, you think there is any doubt, any lack of hard evidence of Russian troops in Ukraine? There is not a “24/7 saturation news bombing” on this because firstly there are many other stories that are deemed of equal or greater importance and secondly because this is old news, everyone willing to accept the facts realises there is a Russian presence
      (d) Seriously, you use the term “Novorossiya”? Even Moscow and the rebels have backed away from using that term.
      (e) Seriously, you think this is a diatribe? Bless. I’m often criticised for being too cautious, too careful. Go read the Daily Beast, go read Ed Lucas, then come back and tell me I write diatribes…

      Reply
  1. MILNEWS.ca #UKR Update – 051250UTC September 2015 | MILNEWS.ca Blog
  2. Will Ukraine Snatch Defeat from the Jaws of Victory? | Elizabeth Pond, select blogs & articles

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: